Tierney v. Court Reporter's Office, First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii
This text of Tierney v. Court Reporter's Office, First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii (Tierney v. Court Reporter's Office, First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
mail §
NO. 30643
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘“
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, PetitiOner,
VS.
coURT REPoRTER's oFFIcE, circuit court of th” First Circuit, State of Hawaii,
33 am 3 "gss‘#l'“ €zll§?;
Respondent.§ x
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Cr. NO. 08-1-O869)
ORDER h (By: Moon, C.J.,'Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney's
petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails
to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. See
Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai‘i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately
the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.) Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq
AuguSt l0, 2010.
w >Y¢u4LL£¢“rv»¢Q»b1aJTb /¢ ””"”"<
£l/-»»€.»v»@e,_~,.a»- //2 EVH“llM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tierney v. Court Reporter's Office, First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-court-reporters-office-first-circuit-cou-haw-2010.