Tierney v. Chan
This text of Tierney v. Chan (Tierney v. Chan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-10-0000207 10-JAN-2011 02:25 PM
NO. SCPW-10-0000207
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE DERRICK H.M. CHAN, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NOS. 88-2209 and 89-0024)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and Circuit Judge Trader, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of
the December 22, 2010 order denying the petition for a writ of
mandamus,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
reconsideration is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 10, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Rom A. Trader
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tierney v. Chan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-chan-haw-2011.