Tierney v. Chan
This text of Tierney v. Chan (Tierney v. Chan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LAW L BP§ARY
NO. 30688
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIT
MlCHAEL C. TlERNEY, PetitiOner, _ VS. THE HONORABLE DERRlCK H. M. CHAN, JUDGE OF THE ; _ COURT OF THE FIRST ClRCUlT, STATE OF HAWAl‘I, Re§p§§`
ORIGlNAL PROCEEDlNG (CR. NO. 88-2209 and CR. NO. 89~OO24)
ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney's petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief. §§§ HRS § 804-51 (Supp 2009); Kema v. Gaddis, 91 HawaiH_200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (l999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
action.).
court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without
payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq August 27, 2010.
g%._
¢Zu»¢ai&¥1H%¢2q15¥§:“ /)a`v*~”-<¢3/vAAA\§§ Q;h..s,.,.s. .Q»g@@,g,f
€W‘YH`IL¢
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tierney v. Chan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-chan-haw-2010.