Tierce v. Knox

92 So. 263, 207 Ala. 121, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 12, 1922
Docket6 Div. 552.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 92 So. 263 (Tierce v. Knox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tierce v. Knox, 92 So. 263, 207 Ala. 121, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 17 (Ala. 1922).

Opinion

McCLBLBAN, J.

The appellant filed this bill in the circuit court of Jefferson county, equity side, to enforce a lien on appellee’s real estate, situated in Jefferson county, imposed, it is averred, by the registration in that county of a judgment obtained by appellant’s intestate in the circuit court of Tuscaloosa county against the appellee. Code, § 4156 et seq. The demurrer’s sole ground denied the equity of the bill. The court sustained the demurrer, allowed time for the amendment of the bill if complainant so desired, and subsequently, there being no amendment, dismissed the bill for want of prosecution.

[1] An appeal lies from such order or decree of dismissal; and on that appeal error may be assigned of the action of the court in previously sustaining the demurrer. Code, § 2838; Nelms v. McGraw, 93 Ala. 245, 9 South. 719; Wynn v. Tallapoosa Bank, 168 Ala. 469, 483, 53 South. 228.

[2] The statutory method for enforcing liens resulting from the registration of judgments is cumulative, not exclusive; and such a lien may be enforced by bill in equity. Code, § 4829; Gurley v. Robertson, 178 Ala. 326, 332, 59 South. 643, and cases there cited. The bill possesses equity.

The court erred in sustaining the demurrer denying the equity of the bill. The decree is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wold v. Bull Valley Management Co.
449 N.E.2d 112 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1983)
Freeman v. Freeman
211 So. 2d 464 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
James E. Folsom v. United States
306 F.2d 361 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Averett v. Averett
52 So. 2d 371 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Hargett v. Hovater
15 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Hall v. Proctor
194 So. 675 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 263, 207 Ala. 121, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierce-v-knox-ala-1922.