Tieppo v. Tieppo
This text of 78 A.D.2d 978 (Tieppo v. Tieppo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: At oral argument the parties agreed, as they did at Special Term, that the child support provision in issue should be construed in the light of the separation agreement and the subsequent modifying stipulation and without parol evidence. Accordingly, we deem any request in the briefs for a remand for additional testimony to have been abandoned. We agree with the conclusion reached in Special Term’s decision as to the intended meaning of the provision. (Appeal from order of Monroe [979]*979Supreme Court — support.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 A.D.2d 978, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tieppo-v-tieppo-nyappdiv-1980.