Home/U.S. Customs Court/Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States

Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States

19 Cust. Ct. 134, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1044
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 19, 1947
DocketNo. 51905; protests 492557-G, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cust. Ct. 134 (Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 134, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1044 (cusc 1947).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial counsel for the plaintiff established by the testimony of a qualified witness that the hats in question are similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Cust. Ct. 134, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tientsin-trading-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1947.