Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 134, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1044
United States Customs Court·Decided September 19, 1947·No. No. 51905; protests 492557-G, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial counsel for the plaintiff established by the testimony of a qualified witness that the hats in question are similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 134, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1044 (cusc 1947).
19 Cust. Ct. 134 (Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)