Tiemans v. Florida Industrial Commission

176 So. 2d 901, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3232
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 1965
DocketNo. 34133
StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 2d 901 (Tiemans v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tiemans v. Florida Industrial Commission, 176 So. 2d 901, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3232 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and heard oral argument on this petition for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission. The order under review remanded the matter to a deputy commissioner to make adequate findings relative to diminution of earning capacity, date of maximum medical recovery and costs of remedial treatment. Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, Fla., 81 So.2d 503.

We find no basis for disturbing the order under review, so the writ must be denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., and KING, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs
81 So. 2d 503 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 2d 901, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiemans-v-florida-industrial-commission-fla-1965.