Tiemann v. Univ. of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Tiemann v. Univ. of Cincinnati

693 N.E.2d 806, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1706

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 6, 1998

Docket98-811

StatusPublished

This text of 693 N.E.2d 806 (Tiemann v. Univ. of Cincinnati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tiemann v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 693 N.E.2d 806, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1706 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 97API10-148. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Whereas appellants have filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction that exceeds the page limit prescribed by S.CtPrac.R. III(1)(C), and a motion to withdraw the memorandum,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that appellants’ motion to withdraw the memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, granted and the memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 97API10-148. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Whereas appellants have filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction that exceeds the page limit prescribed by S.CtPrac.R. III(1)(C), and a motion to withdraw the memorandum,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that appellants’ motion to withdraw the memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, granted and the memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 N.E.2d 806, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiemann-v-univ-of-cincinnati-ohio-1998.