Tieleman Food Equipment B v. and Lindholst & Co., A/s v. Stork Gamco Inc., and Stork Pmt B.V.

40 F.3d 1250, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38697, 1994 WL 589900
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tieleman Food Equipment B v. and Lindholst & Co., A/s v. Stork Gamco Inc., and Stork Pmt B.V.. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 F.3d 1373
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 19, 1994·No. 94-1326·Unpublished

Opinion

40 F.3d 1250

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
TIELEMAN FOOD EQUIPMENT B.V., and Lindholst & Co., A/S,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
STORK GAMCO INC., and Stork PMT B.V., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 94-1326.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1994.

N.D.Ga.

REACTIVATED.

ORDER

The order disposing of the last motion subject to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4) having been filed in the United States District Court/NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, it is

ORDERED that the appeal be, and the same hereby is, REACTIVATED effective October 20, 1994.

The appellant's brief is due on December 19, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tieleman Food Equipment B v. and Lindholst & Co., A/s v. Stork Gamco Inc., and Stork Pmt B.V., 40 F.3d 1250, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38697, 1994 WL 589900 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

40 F.3d 1250 (Tieleman Food Equipment B v. and Lindholst & Co., A/s v. Stork Gamco Inc., and Stork Pmt B.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.