Tieger v. Lundy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tieger v. Lundy

172 A. 729, 113 N.J.L. 160, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 350

DecidedMay 24, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A. 729 (Tieger v. Lundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tieger v. Lundy, 172 A. 729, 113 N.J.L. 160, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 350 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were submitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless, so far as any question is presented for our determination.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Pbrskie, Yan Buskirk, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.-

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were submitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless, so far as any question is presented for our determination.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Pbrskie, Yan Buskirk, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.-

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A. 729, 113 N.J.L. 160, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tieger-v-lundy-nj-1934.