Tiedemann v. Tiedemann

251 U.S. 536, 40 S. Ct. 56, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1812
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 1919·No. No. 438·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, e. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. Homer S. Cummings and Mr. Nash Rockwood for plaintiff in error. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline and Mr, Louis J. Vorhaus for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 251 U.S. 536, 40 S. Ct. 56, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1812 (1919).

251 U.S. 536 (Tiedemann v. Tiedemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kindler v. Kindler
60 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)