Tiedemann v. Tiedemann
251 U.S. 536, 40 S. Ct. 56, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1812
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 17, 1919
DocketNo. 438
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 251 U.S. 536 (Tiedemann v. Tiedemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 251 U.S. 536, 40 S. Ct. 56, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1812 (1919).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, e. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. Homer S. Cummings and Mr. Nash Rockwood for plaintiff in error. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline and Mr, Louis J. Vorhaus for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kindler v. Kindler
60 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
251 U.S. 536, 40 S. Ct. 56, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiedemann-v-tiedemann-scotus-1919.