Tiedemann v. Kroll

Michigan Supreme Court

Tiedemann v. Kroll

107 N.W. 883, 144 Mich. 308, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 1047

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 24, 1906

DocketDocket No. 4

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 107 N.W. 883 (Tiedemann v. Kroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tiedemann v. Kroll, 107 N.W. 883, 144 Mich. 308, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 1047 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). It appears conceded that as to lot 532 the title to which was in Charlea Kroll, the decree is correct, as it was his homestead. Complainant knew at the time of the sale that the title to lot 533 was not in defendant Charles Kroll. The record title at that time was in the defendant Stanton Farm Company, Limited. It was clearly the duty of complainant to proceed within a year after the sale. Daniel v. Palmer, 124 Mich. 335; Kunze v. Solomon, 126 Mich. 290, and authorities there cited.

Decree is affirmed, with costs.

Blair, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ.„ concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). It appears conceded that as to lot 532 the title to which was in Charlea Kroll, the decree is correct, as it was his homestead. Complainant knew at the time of the sale that the title to lot 533 was not in defendant Charles Kroll. The record title at that time was in the defendant Stanton Farm Company, Limited. It was clearly the duty of complainant to proceed within a year after the sale. Daniel v. Palmer, 124 Mich. 335; Kunze v. Solomon, 126 Mich. 290, and authorities there cited.

Decree is affirmed, with costs.

Blair, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ.„ concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.W. 883, 144 Mich. 308, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiedemann-v-kroll-mich-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack