TIE/Communications, Inc. v. United States

Court of International Trade

TIE/Communications, Inc. v. United States

19 Ct. Int'l Trade 977

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedJuly 24, 1995

DocketCourt No. 91-04-00300

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 977 (TIE/Communications, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

TIE/Communications, Inc. v. United States, 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 977 (cit 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Musgrave, Judge:

Defendant United States has requested the Court to amend its final judgment issued pursuant to Slip Op. 95-30 to “clarify” that judgment, apparently confused by the Court’s use of the word “moot” in the earlier proceeding. Specifically, defendant would have the Court, by declaratory judgment, adjudicate its rights to pursue courses of action against third parties not party to the aforementioned case. The Court is not prepared to go so far, but, for purposes of clarification, will amend the original judgment to provide simply that the preliminary [978]*978injunction of May 15, 1991 is terminated. The Court notes that defendant has already filed an action, in this Court, against the said third parties. The rights of the parties in that case will be determined in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Musgrave, Judge:

Defendant United States has requested the Court to amend its final judgment issued pursuant to Slip Op. 95-30 to “clarify” that judgment, apparently confused by the Court’s use of the word “moot” in the earlier proceeding. Specifically, defendant would have the Court, by declaratory judgment, adjudicate its rights to pursue courses of action against third parties not party to the aforementioned case. The Court is not prepared to go so far, but, for purposes of clarification, will amend the original judgment to provide simply that the preliminary [978]*978injunction of May 15, 1991 is terminated. The Court notes that defendant has already filed an action, in this Court, against the said third parties. The rights of the parties in that case will be determined in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ct. Int'l Trade 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiecommunications-inc-v-united-states-cit-1995.