Tidy House Paper Products, Inc. v. Automatic Fire Alarm Co.
This text of 281 A.D. 1036 (Tidy House Paper Products, Inc. v. Automatic Fire Alarm Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a consolidated action by tenants to recover damages for alleged negligence of respondent in failing to transmit a signal that a sprinkler system was operating, in accordance with its duty under its contract with the landlord, judgment dismissing complaints unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co., 247 N. T. 160, 167, 168; Rosenbaum v. Branster Realty Corp., 276 App. Div. 167; Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American Dist. Tel. Co., 77 A. 2d 776 [Md.].) No.actionable negligence was established. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 1036, 121 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidy-house-paper-products-inc-v-automatic-fire-alarm-co-nyappdiv-1953.