Tidy House Paper Products, Inc. v. Automatic Fire Alarm Co.

281 A.D. 1036, 121 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4245
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a consolidated action by tenants to recover damages for alleged negligence of respondent in failing to transmit a signal that a sprinkler system was operating, in accordance with its duty under its contract with the landlord, judgment dismissing complaints unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co., 247 N. T. 160, 167, 168; Rosenbaum v. Branster Realty Corp., 276 App. Div. 167; Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American Dist. Tel. Co., 77 A. 2d 776 [Md.].) No.actionable negligence was established. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tidy House Paper Products, Inc. v. Automatic Fire Alarm Co., 281 A.D. 1036, 121 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 1036 (Tidy House Paper Products, Inc. v. Automatic Fire Alarm Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

World Trade Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Lido Knitting Mills, Inc.
154 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Corporate Leasing, Inc. v. AFA Protective Systems, Inc.
101 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)