Tidwell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tidwell v. State

186 So. 777, 28 Ala. App. 459, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 108

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 1939·No. 8 Div. 708.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

This prosecution was brought by affidavit and warrant returnable to the County Court, in which Court this defendant was convicted, and from that judgment he appealed to the Circuit Court where conviction was again had.

To the complaint, as filed by the Solicitor in the Circuit Court, the defendant interposed a plea of autrefois convict. There appears in the record a demurrer to this plea, but there is no judgment of-the Court passing upon the' demurrer; and ■ hence there is nothing here for us to consider. ■"

There is no Bill:-of Exceptions.; The record appears in all things regular.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

This prosecution was brought by affidavit and warrant returnable to the County Court, in which Court this defendant was convicted, and from that judgment he appealed to the Circuit Court where conviction was again had.

To the complaint, as filed by the Solicitor in the Circuit Court, the defendant interposed a plea of autrefois convict. There appears in the record a demurrer to this plea, but there is no judgment of-the Court passing upon the' demurrer; and ■ hence there is nothing here for us to consider. ■"

There is no Bill:-of Exceptions.; The record appears in all things regular.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Affirmed.

Tidwell v. State, 186 So. 777, 28 Ala. App. 459, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 108 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

186 So. 777 (Tidwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.