Tidwell v. State

186 So. 777, 28 Ala. App. 459, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 108
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 1939
Docket8 Div. 708.
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 777 (Tidwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tidwell v. State, 186 So. 777, 28 Ala. App. 459, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 108 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

This prosecution was brought by affidavit and warrant returnable to the County Court, in which Court this defendant was convicted, and from that judgment he appealed to the Circuit Court where conviction was again had.

To the complaint, as filed by the Solicitor in the Circuit Court, the defendant interposed a plea of autrefois convict. There appears in the record a demurrer to this plea, but there is no judgment of-the Court passing upon the' demurrer; and ■ hence there is nothing here for us to consider. ■"

There is no Bill:-of Exceptions.; The record appears in all things regular.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 777, 28 Ala. App. 459, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidwell-v-state-alactapp-1939.