Tidwell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tidwell v. State

121 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 682

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tidwell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 409 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 1929·No. 8 Div. 715.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of assault to murder and appeals.

The record in this case discloses a clear case of assault to murder and a fair trial. The rulings of the court gave to the defend1 ant every right to which he was entitled. The charge of the court was full and free from error, and every refused written charge, embracing a correct principle of law, was fully covered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of assault to murder and appeals.

The record in this case discloses a clear case of assault to murder and a fair trial. The rulings of the court gave to the defend1 ant every right to which he was entitled. The charge of the court was full and free from error, and every refused written charge, embracing a correct principle of law, was fully covered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Tidwell v. State, 121 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 926 (Tidwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.