Tidwell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tidwell v. State

121 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 682

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 19, 1929

Docket8 Div. 715.

StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 926 (Tidwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tidwell v. State, 121 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of assault to murder and appeals.

The record in this case discloses a clear case of assault to murder and a fair trial. The rulings of the court gave to the defend1 ant every right to which he was entitled. The charge of the court was full and free from error, and every refused written charge, embracing a correct principle of law, was fully covered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of assault to murder and appeals.

The record in this case discloses a clear case of assault to murder and a fair trial. The rulings of the court gave to the defend1 ant every right to which he was entitled. The charge of the court was full and free from error, and every refused written charge, embracing a correct principle of law, was fully covered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidwell-v-state-alactapp-1929.