Tidwell v. Kerscheval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tidwell v. Kerscheval

37 A.D.2d 832, 325 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3120

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 832 (Tidwell v. Kerscheval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tidwell v. Kerscheval, 37 A.D.2d 832, 325 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 13, 1971, in favor of plaintiff, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless plaintiff, within 20 days of service upon her by defendant of a copy of the order entered hereon stipulates to accept $7,500 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment as so reduced and amended, is affirmed without costs and without disbursements. It is our opinion that the award by verdict of $12,000 was excessive and is not supported by the record. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Tilzer and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 13, 1971, in favor of plaintiff, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless plaintiff, within 20 days of service upon her by defendant of a copy of the order entered hereon stipulates to accept $7,500 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment as so reduced and amended, is affirmed without costs and without disbursements. It is our opinion that the award by verdict of $12,000 was excessive and is not supported by the record. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Tilzer and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 832, 325 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidwell-v-kerscheval-nyappdiv-1971.