Tidwell ex rel. Tidwell v. Southland Corp.
This text of 417 So. 2d 315 (Tidwell ex rel. Tidwell v. Southland Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Michael W. Tidwell, a minor, sued The Southland Corporation for injuries he suffered when he tripped while jogging on a path on the Corporation’s property and fell into a ditch. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the Southland Corporation.
We find that there are disputed issues of material fact or disputed inferences to be derived from those facts regarding the condition of the path itself and the sufficiency of the lighting for this night-time accident. Accordingly, the cause was not ripe for summary judgment [Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c)], and the judgment must be reversed.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 So. 2d 315, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidwell-ex-rel-tidwell-v-southland-corp-fladistctapp-1982.