Tidmore v. Tidmore
This text of 16 So. 2d 319 (Tidmore v. Tidmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bill of complaint filed by the wife-against the husband for divorce on the ground of cruelty — actual violence committed by the husband upon her — attended’ with danger to life or health. Code 1940,. Tit. 34, § 22.
The appeal is from an interlocutory decree overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the bill. The bill is single in purpose,, seeking divorce, and incidental relief, permanent alimony and custody and support for the children. It does not ask for alimony pendente lite. 17 Am.Jur. §§ 513, 514. The demurrer, which goes to the bill', as a whole, challenges the sufficiency of its averment, but does not invoke the court’s discretionary powers as to alimony. That is a matter to be presented by petition asking for the allowance after answer and on; proof. Ex parte Austin, ante, p. -, 15 So.2d 710.
The allegations of the bill are sufficient to bring the case within the statute and the demurrer to the bill was properly-overruled. Williams v. Williams, 239 Ala. 162, 194 So. 507; Harris v. Harris, 230 Ala. 508, 162 So. 102; Kelly v. Carmichael, 217 Ala. 534, 117 So. 67.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 So. 2d 319, 245 Ala. 149, 1944 Ala. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidmore-v-tidmore-ala-1944.