Tidmore v. Boyce

9 S.C.L. 200
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1818·Published

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Nott.

Our act of Assembly makes all securities given in consideration of money won at cards void, even in the hands of an innocent endorsee. With the policy of the law the Court has nothing to do. It is sufficient that ita lex scripta est. This note is of that description. The verdict, therefore, is against law and evidence, and a new trial must be granted.

Colcoclc, Cheves, and Johnson, J. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tidmore v. Boyce, 9 S.C.L. 200 (S.C. 1818).

9 S.C.L. 200 (Tidmore v. Boyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.