Tidey v. Erie Railroad

51 A. 1110, 67 N.J.L. 352, 38 Vroom 352, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tidey v. Erie Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 N.J.L. 382
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 3, 1902·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon. 37 Vroom 382.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Adams, Vredenbuegh, Voorhees. 9.

For reversal — Pitney, Vroom. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tidey v. Erie Railroad, 51 A. 1110, 67 N.J.L. 352, 38 Vroom 352, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 118 (N.J. 1902).

51 A. 1110 (Tidey v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tidey v. Erie Railroad
49 A. 427 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1901)