Tidewater Development And Sales Corporation v. United States
This text of 279 F.2d 890 (Tidewater Development And Sales Corporation v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TIDEWATER DEVELOPMENT AND SALES CORPORATION and Isadore
Brill, Trustee, Oliver Ellsworth Rue, Trustee, Gotham
Inbestment Corporation, Philip Smith, Harold E. Luber,
Morris Reamer, and Roberta Hoffman, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 8039.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
May 30, 1960.
John Joseph Baecher and S. Beryl Adler, Norfolk, Va., for appellants.
Joseph S. Bambacus, U.S. Atty., Richmone, Va., Franklin C. Baugh, Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, S. Billingsley Hill, and Elizabeth Dudley, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this condemnation case, the landowner and certain notehlders, to whom it is indebted, thinking the jury's verdict inadequate, complain of the District Court's refusal of a motion for new trial. In denying the motion, the District Court filed an opinion1 which sufficiently shows there was no abuse of discretion in denial of the motion. After considering certain collateral questions which have been raised, we find no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 F.2d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidewater-development-and-sales-corporation-v-united-states-ca4-1960.