TIDD, KENNETH v. HACKETT, MICHELLE
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1394 CAF 13-00780 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH R. TIDD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
MICHELLE L. HACKETT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
EMILY A. VELLA, SPRINGVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ADAM W. KOCH, WARSAW, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
JAMES ANDREW MUSACCHIO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, GOWANDA.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Judith E. Samber, R.), entered December 3, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, designated petitioner as the primary residential parent of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
TIDD, KENNETH v. HACKETT, MICHELLE (TIDD, KENNETH v. HACKETT, MICHELLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.