Tidabock v. United States Gypsum Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tidabock v. United States Gypsum Co.

282 A.D. 1065, 126 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1065 (Tidabock v. United States Gypsum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tidabock v. United States Gypsum Co., 282 A.D. 1065, 126 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the jury rendered a verdict of $11,000 in plaintiff’s favor and against defendants. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered thereon and from “ determina[1066]*1066tion” denying their motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate, within ten days after the entry of an order hereon, to reduce the verdict to $7,500, in which event, the judgment, as thus reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive. Appeal from “determination” dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the jury rendered a verdict of $11,000 in plaintiff’s favor and against defendants. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered thereon and from “ determina[1066]*1066tion” denying their motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate, within ten days after the entry of an order hereon, to reduce the verdict to $7,500, in which event, the judgment, as thus reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive. Appeal from “determination” dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1065, 126 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidabock-v-united-states-gypsum-co-nyappdiv-1953.