Tidaback v. Rude

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tidaback v. Rude

48 A.2d 917, 138 N.J. Eq. 479, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 372

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 13, 1946·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 59.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Waohenfeld, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 59.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Waohenfeld, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Tidaback v. Rude, 48 A.2d 917, 138 N.J. Eq. 479, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 372 (N.J. 1946).

Pincite

48 A.2d 917 (Tidaback v. Rude) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.