Tidaback v. Rude

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tidaback v. Rude

48 A.2d 917, 138 N.J. Eq. 479, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 372

DecidedSeptember 13, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.2d 917 (Tidaback v. Rude) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tidaback v. Rude, 48 A.2d 917, 138 N.J. Eq. 479, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 372 (N.J. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 59.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Waohenfeld, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 59.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Waohenfeld, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.2d 917, 138 N.J. Eq. 479, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidaback-v-rude-nj-1946.