Ticknor v. Calhoun

28 La. Ann. 258
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1876·No. No. 6228·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lüdeling, O. J.

This is an attachment suit against a non-resident. The-curator ad hoc filed an answer and exceptions, and after trial and judgment it was discovered that no evidence of the citation of the absentee had been made, and although both parties had asked for a new trial, on different grounds, the court a Qua refused it.

So far as this record shows, the absentee has not boon cited. The-curator ad hoc can not, directly or indirectly, waive citation. g

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the lower court be reversed, and that the ease be remanded to be proceeded with according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ticknor v. Calhoun, 28 La. Ann. 258 (La. 1876).

28 La. Ann. 258 (Ticknor v. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inter City Express Lines, Inc. v. Guarisco
165 So. 727 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Haley v. Woods
113 So. 144 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Mitchell & Rammelsburg Furniture Co. v. Sampson
40 F. 805 (United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida, 1889)