Ticheli v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ticheli v. Safir

255 A.D.2d 272, 680 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12722

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 272 (Ticheli v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ticheli v. Safir, 255 A.D.2d 272, 680 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered August 26, 1997, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner a pistol carry permit, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that petitioner fails to demonstrate that his transporting of valuable watches places him at unusual risk of danger that gives him a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of countless others who do business in the City without benefit of a license to carry a concealed pistol (see, Matter of Milo v Kelly, 211 AD2d 488). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered August 26, 1997, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner a pistol carry permit, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that petitioner fails to demonstrate that his transporting of valuable watches places him at unusual risk of danger that gives him a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of countless others who do business in the City without benefit of a license to carry a concealed pistol (see, Matter of Milo v Kelly, 211 AD2d 488). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 272, 680 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ticheli-v-safir-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack