Tice v. State

243 So. 2d 451
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1971·No. No. M-376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Austin v. State, 160 So.2d 730 (Fla.App.1964), and Tice v. Wainwright, Case No. L-282 in the records of this court.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tice v. State, 243 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

243 So. 2d 451 (Tice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
838 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)