Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co.
274 A.D. 970, 85 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4290
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence does not sustain the findings of the jury as to the negligence of the defendant and contributory negligence of the plaintiff. All concur, except Larkin, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co., 274 A.D. 970, 85 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
274 A.D. 970 (Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oldfield v. Neisner Bros.
285 A.D. 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)