Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co.
This text of 274 A.D. 970 (Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence does not sustain the findings of the jury as to the negligence of the defendant and contributory negligence of the plaintiff. All concur, except Larkin, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 970, 85 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tice-v-oppenheim-collins-co-nyappdiv-1948.