Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co.
87 N.E.2d 57, 299 N.Y. 662, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1106
This text of 87 N.E.2d 57 (Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tice v. Oppenheim Collins & Co., 87 N.E.2d 57, 299 N.Y. 662, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1106 (N.Y. 1949).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Desmond, Dye and Bromley, JJ. Loughran, Ch. J., Conway and Fuld, JJ., dissent upon the ground that the issues as to negligence and contributory negligence were proper for submission to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 N.E.2d 57, 299 N.Y. 662, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tice-v-oppenheim-collins-co-ny-1949.