Tice v. Crawford
75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 352, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 398
Opinion
The Supreme Court and this court have uniformly held that the discretion of the judge of the superior court in granting a first new trial on certiorari will not be interfered with, unless the judgment under review was demanded by the law and the evidence. Loftin v. Great Southern Some Benevolent Asso., 9 Ga. App. 121 (70 S. E. 353), and citations; 14 Encyc. Dig. Ga. Rep. 364. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tice v. Crawford, 75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 352, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 398 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
75 S.E. 268 (Tice v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loftin v. Great Southern Home Benevolent Ass'n
70 S.E. 353 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)