Tice v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tice v. Crawford

75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 352, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 398

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 23, 1912

Docket4121

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 268 (Tice v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tice v. Crawford, 75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 352, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 398 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The Supreme Court and this court have uniformly held that the discretion of the judge of the superior court in granting a first new trial on certiorari will not be interfered with, unless the judgment under review was demanded by the law and the evidence. Loftin v. Great Southern Some Benevolent Asso., 9 Ga. App. 121 (70 S. E. 353), and citations; 14 Encyc. Dig. Ga. Rep. 364. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The Supreme Court and this court have uniformly held that the discretion of the judge of the superior court in granting a first new trial on certiorari will not be interfered with, unless the judgment under review was demanded by the law and the evidence. Loftin v. Great Southern Some Benevolent Asso., 9 Ga. App. 121 (70 S. E. 353), and citations; 14 Encyc. Dig. Ga. Rep. 364. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 352, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tice-v-crawford-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack