Tiburcio v. State

95 So. 3d 1037, 2012 WL 3758658, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 2012·No. No. 5D12-2296·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks release from the Florida State Hospital because he is incompetent to proceed on his criminal charges and cannot be restored to competency in the foreseeable future. Petitioner also seeks dismissal of the pending charges. The State concedes that Petitioner’s continued detention is unlawful, but argues that the dismissal of the charges is premature because five years have not elapsed since Petitioner was found incompetent. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1). We agree with the State on both issues.

Accordingly, we grant the Petition in part and deny it in part. We direct the trial court to order Petitioner’s release. Although the State has indicated that it does not intend to seek civil commitment at this time, this decision is without prejudice to the State instituting civil commitment proceedings.

PETITION GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

ORFINGER, C.J., TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiburcio v. State, 95 So. 3d 1037, 2012 WL 3758658, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

95 So. 3d 1037 (Tiburcio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Carey
212 So. 3d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
State of Florida v. Cynthia J. Benninghoff
188 So. 3d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Bryant v. State
99 So. 3d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Cruz v. State
97 So. 3d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)