Tibbs v. State

341 S.W.2d 932, 170 Tex. Crim. 424, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5231
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 1961
DocketNo. 32,599
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 341 S.W.2d 932 (Tibbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tibbs v. State, 341 S.W.2d 932, 170 Tex. Crim. 424, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5231 (Tex. 1961).

Opinion

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for negligent homicide in the first degree; the punishment, nine months in jail.

The information alleged that the appelant, while lawfully [425]*425operating an automobile, was negligent in several respects and further alleged that while so operating the automobile he drove it “into and against the said Gary Wilks” thereby inflicting serious bodily injury resulting in the death of said Gary Wilks.

It is undisputed that the automobile appellant was driving east on the south side of an east-west expressway struck the south curb, then travelled to the left striking a traffic island six to eight inches high and from two and one-half to three feet wide, overturned and came to rest partly on the island and partly in the south lane of the two lanes on the north side; and that the automobile traveling west, in which the deceased was riding as a passenger, skidded thirty-nine feet before striking appellant’s automobile resulting in the deceased’s death.

The proof fails to correspond with and support the material allegations in the information. All the evidence, both for the state and the appellant, shows that the appellant did not, as alleged, drive his automobile into and against Gary Wilks thereby inflicting serious bodily injury restulting in his death.

The failure of the proof introduced to support the material allegations in the information calls for a reversal. Fuller v. State, 120 Tex. Cr. Rep. 66, 48 S.W. 2d 303; Fannin v. State, 168 Tex. Cr. Rep. 593, 331 S.W. 2d 47.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

McDonald, J. not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shawn L. Keck v. E.G. Meek, Sr.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2018
Ortiz v. State
661 S.W.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Hancock v. State
363 S.W.2d 273 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 S.W.2d 932, 170 Tex. Crim. 424, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tibbs-v-state-texcrimapp-1961.