Tibbs v. Parrott
23 F. Cas. 1196, 1 Cranch 177
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided July 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
(nem. con.) allowed Mr. Swann to amend, it being a different amendment from the one mentioned by Mr. Mason, and not changing the cause of action; but THE COURT expressed an unwillingness to extend the rule further than it had been.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tibbs v. Parrott, 23 F. Cas. 1196, 1 Cranch 177 (circtddc 1804).
23 F. Cas. 1196 (Tibbs v. Parrott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacDonald & Co. v. Differential Steel Car Co.
8 F.R.D. 223 (N.D. Ohio, 1948)
The King v. Testa
7 Haw. 201 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1888)
Crescent City Gaslight Co. v. New Orleans Gaslight Co.
27 La. 138 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1875)
Anderson v. Baker
23 Md. 531 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1865)
State ex rel. Gentry v. Fry
4 Mo. 120 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1835)