Tibbs v. Boemi
263 A.2d 785, 55 N.J. 531, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 168
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance ■ — ■ Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Proctor, Hall, Sohettino and ELane-man — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tibbs v. Boemi, 263 A.2d 785, 55 N.J. 531, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1970).
263 A.2d 785 (Tibbs v. Boemi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lizak v. Faria
465 A.2d 524 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
State v. Elysee
388 A.2d 254 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Schere v. Township of Freehold
375 A.2d 1218 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Golaine v. Cardinale
361 A.2d 593 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Lehrhaupt v. Flynn
356 A.2d 35 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Fivehouse v. Passaic Valley Water Comm.
317 A.2d 755 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
State v. Leonardo
263 A.2d 785 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)