Tibble v. Edison International

Ninth Circuit

Tibble v. Edison International

831 F.3d 1262, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14413, 2016 WL 4151382

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 5, 2016

DocketNos. 10-56406, 10-56415

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 831 F.3d 1262 (Tibble v. Edison International) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tibble v. Edison International, 831 F.3d 1262, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14413, 2016 WL 4151382 (9th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Bybee, Ikuta and Owens did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Bybee, Ikuta and Owens did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

831 F.3d 1262, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14413, 2016 WL 4151382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tibble-v-edison-international-ca9-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack