Tibbetts v. Sartwell

29 A. 411, 67 N.H. 418
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 29 A. 411 (Tibbetts v. Sartwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tibbetts v. Sartwell, 29 A. 411, 67 N.H. 418 (N.H. 1892).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

It is not found that the conduct of Mrs. George justified her exclusion from the room in which the furniture was appraised. The parties could have agreed that both or neither of them should be present when the appraisal was made. But an agreement cannot be inferred that either should have an exclusive right to be present at the determination of the question of value, in which they were equally and adversely interested. Hook v. Philbrick, 23 N. H. 288. The plaintiff, by wrongfully preventing Mrs. George from attending the appraisal, gave her the right she exercised to rescind the contract.

Judgment for the, defendant for $W0.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A. 411, 67 N.H. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tibbetts-v-sartwell-nh-1892.