Tibbals v. Daby

S.D. New York

Tibbals v. Daby

11 F. 903, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777

DecidedDecember 6, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. 903 (Tibbals v. Daby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tibbals v. Daby, 11 F. 903, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777 (S.D.N.Y. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Blatchford, C. J.

I am of opinion that it is shown that the defendant has infringed claim 1 of patent No. 79,534, and that nothing is proved sufficient to show that said claim is invalid. I am also of opinion that the defendant’s arrangement does not infringe claim 4, or 5, or 6 of patent No. 101,295, or any other claim of that patent. The usual decree will be entered for the plaintiff on claim 1 of patent No. 79,534, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blatchford, C. J.

I am of opinion that it is shown that the defendant has infringed claim 1 of patent No. 79,534, and that nothing is proved sufficient to show that said claim is invalid. I am also of opinion that the defendant’s arrangement does not infringe claim 4, or 5, or 6 of patent No. 101,295, or any other claim of that patent. The usual decree will be entered for the plaintiff on claim 1 of patent No. 79,534, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. 903, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tibbals-v-daby-nysd-1880.