Tiara S. Jones v. Automotive Credit Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 20, 2015
DocketA15A1653
StatusPublished

This text of Tiara S. Jones v. Automotive Credit Corporation (Tiara S. Jones v. Automotive Credit Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tiara S. Jones v. Automotive Credit Corporation, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 14, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1653. TIARA S. JONES v. AUTOMOTIVE CREDIT CORPORATION.

On January 9, 2015, the trial court entered judgment against Tiara Jones in the amount of $2,875.83, plus $856.32 in interest, $217.50 in attorney fees, and $399.78 in court costs. On February 4, 2015 she filed a notice of appeal declaring that she was appealing to the Supreme Court. Jones subsequently amended her notice of appeal to indicate that she was appealing to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), appeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must comply with the discretionary appeal procedures. “Although the grant of a motion for summary judgment is in general directly appealable, where the amount of the judgment is [$10,000] or less, an application for discretionary appeal is required.” Lightwerk Studios v. Door Units of Ga., 184 Ga. App. 148, 149 (361 SE2d 32) (1987). Because this suit is an action for damages and the judgment entered was less than $10,000, Jones was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain appellate review. Because she failed to do so, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/14/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lightwerk Studios, Inc. v. Door Units of Georgia, Inc.
361 S.E.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tiara S. Jones v. Automotive Credit Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiara-s-jones-v-automotive-credit-corporation-gactapp-2015.