Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States

925 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2013 WL 3988676, 35 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1919, 2013 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 104

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 F. Supp. 3d 1062 →

United States Court of International Trade·Decided August 6, 2013·No. Slip Op. 13-100; Court No. 11-00070·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

LEO M. GORDON, Judge.

In this action Defendant sought and received a voluntary remand. See ECF No. 32 (Defi’s motion for voluntary remand); ECF No. 34 (order granting voluntary remand). Defendant filed its remand results on July 22, 2013. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, Court No. 11-00070 (July 22, 2013) (“Redetermination”), ECF No. 39. All parties concur with the Redetermination. See ECF No. 41 (letter on behalf of all parties that court should sustain remand results). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination is sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 12 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance "with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

LEO M. GORDON, Judge.

In this action Defendant sought and received a voluntary remand. See ECF No. 32 (Defi’s motion for voluntary remand); ECF No. 34 (order granting voluntary remand). Defendant filed its remand results on July 22, 2013. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, Court No. 11-00070 (July 22, 2013) (“Redetermination”), ECF No. 39. All parties concur with the Redetermination. See ECF No. 41 (letter on behalf of all parties that court should sustain remand results). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination is sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 12 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance "with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2006).

Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, 925 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2013 WL 3988676, 35 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1919, 2013 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 104 (cit 2013).

Pincite

925 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related