Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States

925 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2013 WL 3988676, 35 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1919, 2013 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 104

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedAugust 6, 2013

DocketSlip Op. 13-100; Court No. 11-00070

StatusPublished

This text of 925 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, 925 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2013 WL 3988676, 35 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1919, 2013 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 104 (cit 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

LEO M. GORDON, Judge.

In this action Defendant sought and received a voluntary remand. See ECF No. 32 (Defi’s motion for voluntary remand); ECF No. 34 (order granting voluntary remand). Defendant filed its remand results on July 22, 2013. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, Court No. 11-00070 (July 22, 2013) (“Redetermination”), ECF No. 39. All parties concur with the Redetermination. See ECF No. 41 (letter on behalf of all parties that court should sustain remand results). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination is sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 12 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance "with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

LEO M. GORDON, Judge.

In this action Defendant sought and received a voluntary remand. See ECF No. 32 (Defi’s motion for voluntary remand); ECF No. 34 (order granting voluntary remand). Defendant filed its remand results on July 22, 2013. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, Court No. 11-00070 (July 22, 2013) (“Redetermination”), ECF No. 39. All parties concur with the Redetermination. See ECF No. 41 (letter on behalf of all parties that court should sustain remand results). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination is sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 12 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance "with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2006).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2013 WL 3988676, 35 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1919, 2013 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tianjin-wanhua-co-v-united-states-cit-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack