Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd. v. United States

2013 CIT 100
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedAugust 6, 2013
Docket11-00070
StatusPublished

This text of 2013 CIT 100 (Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd. v. United States, 2013 CIT 100 (cit 2013).

Opinion

Slip Op. 13-100

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

TIANJIN WANHUA CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge v. Court No. 11-00070 UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In this action Defendant sought and received a voluntary remand. See ECF No. 32 (Def.’s motion for voluntary remand); ECF No. 34 (order granting voluntary remand). Defendant filed its remand results on July 22, 2013. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United States, Court No. 11-00070 (July 22, 2013) (“Redetermination”), ECF No. 39. All parties concur with the Redetermination. See ECF No. 41 (letter on behalf of all parties that court should sustain remand results). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Redetermination is sustained; and it is further ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 12 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2006).

/s/ Leo M. Gordon Judge Leo M. Gordon

Dated: August 6, 2013 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 CIT 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tianjin-wanhua-co-ltd-v-united-states-cit-2013.