Tiana Barnes v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nebraska
DecidedOctober 31, 2025
Docket8:25-cv-00151
StatusUnknown

This text of Tiana Barnes v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Tiana Barnes v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tiana Barnes v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, (D. Neb. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

TIANA BARNES,

Plaintiff, 8:25CV151

v. ORDER FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Tiana Barnes’s (“Barnes”) Motion for Attorney Fees (Filing No. 21) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), see 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), which authorizes an award of reasonable attorney fees and other expenses in certain civil actions brought “against the United States.” See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). The defendant, Commissioner of Social Security Frank Bisignano (“Commissioner”), agrees (Filing No. 22) the Court should award Barnes attorney fees in the requested amount of $3,698.72 as compensation for all legal services her counsel rendered in this case. That proposed award represents 14.35 hours of work at $257.75 an hour. In support of Barnes’s motion, she has submitted an itemization of her attorneys’ time as well as Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (stating the Court may award fees in excess of $125 per hour if warranted by an increase in the cost of living); see also Miller v. Alamo, 983 F.2d 856, 861 (8th Cir. 1993) (noting that the CPI “constituted proper proof of the increased cost of living” and “an increase in the fee awards based on the CPI is proper”). In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589-90 (2010), the parties acknowledge the EAJA fee award is payable directly to Barnes and subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt she may owe to the United States. Barnes requests that the Court order the fees be delivered to her attorney at Kappelman Law Firm for distribution.

After careful review, the Court finds Barnes’s unopposed motion should be approved. The fee award satisfies the EAJA’s statutory requirements, see 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), and is reasonable under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Tiana Barnes’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Filing No. 21) is approved. 2. Barnes is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,698.72, subject to any administrative offset required to satisfy any pre-existing debt she may owe to the United States. 3. The Social Security Administration shall make the fee award payable to Barnes and deliver the payment to Kappelman Law Firm at its address of record. 4. A separate judgment will issue.

Dated this 31st day of October 2025. BY THE COURT:

Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Miller v. Alamo
983 F.2d 856 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tiana Barnes v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiana-barnes-v-frank-bisignano-commissioner-of-the-social-security-ned-2025.