Tiakoh v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

• Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
• Decided: October 6, 2025
• Docket: 8:25-cv-01706
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Alexandra Tiakoh,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:25-cv-01706-WFJ-AEP

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Defendant.

/ ORDER

Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s report recommending that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) be granted. Dkt. 6. The time for filing objections has passed. Absent objection, the Court conducts a “careful and complete” review of the report and recommendation. Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982 (per curiam) (quotation citation omitted). “Clear error” review applies to portions of the report and recommendation to which no objection is made. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (citation modified). Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App’x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams, 681 F.2d at 732.

The Magistrate Judge, in a thorough and well-reasoned analysis, found that the complaint (Dkt. 1) alleges a sufficient basis to support a reasonable inference that Defendant is liable for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. 15 U.S.C. §

1681(a), e(b), g, n. Dkt. 6 at 5. Having performed a de novo and independent review of the Complaint, and for the sound reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation, the Court rules as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 6) is adopted, confirmed, and

approved in all respects and made a part of this Order. 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff Alexandra Tiakoh is DIRECTED to file a proposed summons

with the Clerk’s Office, serve process, and file proof of service or a status report concerning the same by November 20, 2025. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 6, 2025.

s/William F. Jung WILLIAM F. JUNG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Plaintiff, pro se