Tiajoloff v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tiajoloff v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services

890 So. 2d 1245, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 237, 2005 WL 94681

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 2005

DocketNo. 3D03-1151

StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 1245 (Tiajoloff v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tiajoloff v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, 890 So. 2d 1245, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 237, 2005 WL 94681 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the substantial, competent evidence adduced below that the appellants’ citrus trees have been exposed to citrus canker by virtue of their proximity to other diseased citrus trees, we affirm the immediate final order issued by the appellee permitting the removal of the appellants’ trees. See Haire v. Fla. Dept. of Agrie. & Consumer Servs., 870 So.2d 774 (Fla.2004); Sapp Farms, Inc. v. Fla. Dept. of Agrie, and Consumer Servs., 761 So.2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Nordmann v. Fla. Dept. of Agric, and Consumer Servs., 473 So.2d 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Denney v. Conner, 462 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the substantial, competent evidence adduced below that the appellants’ citrus trees have been exposed to citrus canker by virtue of their proximity to other diseased citrus trees, we affirm the immediate final order issued by the appellee permitting the removal of the appellants’ trees. See Haire v. Fla. Dept. of Agrie. & Consumer Servs., 870 So.2d 774 (Fla.2004); Sapp Farms, Inc. v. Fla. Dept. of Agrie, and Consumer Servs., 761 So.2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Nordmann v. Fla. Dept. of Agric, and Consumer Servs., 473 So.2d 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Denney v. Conner, 462 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

890 So. 2d 1245, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 237, 2005 WL 94681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiajoloff-v-department-of-agriculture-consumer-services-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack