Tia Adams v. The Glen at Shawmont Station, et al.
This text of Tia Adams v. The Glen at Shawmont Station, et al. (Tia Adams v. The Glen at Shawmont Station, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TIA ADAMS, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : : THE GLEN AT SHAWMONT STATION, : No. 25-cv-4231 et al., : Defendants. :
ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of October 2025, upon review of Defendant Hazlet Shawmont Holdings, LLC’s Notice of Removal (ECF No. 1), Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13), Defendant Hazlet Shawmont Holdings, LLC’s Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 18), and the docket, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion. 2. The following Defendants are DISMISSED from this lawsuit:1 a. Defendant Aion Management, LLC; and b. Defendant CBRE, Inc.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Chad F. Kenney _________________________ CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE
1 Upon a finding of fraudulent joinder, a district court can “assume jurisdiction over a case” and “dismiss the nondiverse defendants, and thereby retain jurisdiction.” In re Briscoe, 448 F.3d 201, 206 (3d Cir. 2006) (citation omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tia Adams v. The Glen at Shawmont Station, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tia-adams-v-the-glen-at-shawmont-station-et-al-paed-2025.