Thurston v. Seay

Fourth Circuit

Thurston v. Seay

60 F. App'x 489

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2003·No. Nos. 03-1016, 03-1017, 03-1018·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leroy M. Thurston, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders denying his applications to proceed in forma pauperis in each of his civil actions. Thurston fails to establish the district court erred in denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and dismiss these appeals. See Thurston v. Seay, No. CA-02-7-3; Thurston v. Beskins, No. CA-02-6-3; Thurston v. Collins, No. CA-02-5-3 (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leroy M. Thurston, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders denying his applications to proceed in forma pauperis in each of his civil actions. Thurston fails to establish the district court erred in denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and dismiss these appeals. See Thurston v. Seay, No. CA-02-7-3; Thurston v. Beskins, No. CA-02-6-3; Thurston v. Collins, No. CA-02-5-3 (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Thurston v. Seay, 60 F. App'x 489 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 489 (Thurston v. Seay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.