Thurston v. Beskins

Fourth Circuit

Thurston v. Beskins

96 F. App'x 877

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2004·No. No. 04-1006·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thurston’s motion for counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thurston v. Beskins, No. CA-03-61 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thurston’s motion for counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thurston v. Beskins, No. CA-03-61 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Thurston v. Beskins, 96 F. App'x 877 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

96 F. App'x 877 (Thurston v. Beskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.