Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 20, 2019·No. 01-18-00858-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS Cause number: 01-18-00858-CR Style: Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 8, 2019 Type of motions: Pro se Motions for Access to Appellate Record and for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Anders Brief Response Party filing motions: Pro se Appellant Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is: ☐ Granted ☐ Denied ☒ Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) ☒ Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s pro se Anders brief response was filed on August 8, 2019, and cites to the records. Accordingly, appellant’s pro se motions for access to the appellate record and for an extension of time to file a pro se Anders brief response are dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Evelyn .V. Keyes_______  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __August 20, 2019______

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State (Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.