Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTIONS Cause number: 01-18-00858-CR Style: Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 8, 2019 Type of motions: Pro se Motions for Access to Appellate Record and for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Anders Brief Response Party filing motions: Pro se Appellant Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis Document to be filed: N/A
Is appeal accelerated? No.
Ordered that motion is: ☐ Granted ☐ Denied ☒ Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) ☒ Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s pro se Anders brief response was filed on August 8, 2019, and cites to the records. Accordingly, appellant’s pro se motions for access to the appellate record and for an extension of time to file a pro se Anders brief response are dismissed as moot.
Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Evelyn .V. Keyes_______ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __August 20, 2019______
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State (Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.