Thurston, Greene & Co. v. Roger Williams Mining Co.
This text of 1 R.I. 288 (Thurston, Greene & Co. v. Roger Williams Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion that default be taken off and the case reinstated, on the ground that the defendants counsel, a practising Attorney in the Courts of both Rhode-Island and Massachusetts, was detained at the time the case was-defaulted in the Massachusetts Court; and that there was-a defence, which facts were sworn to on affidavit.
Motion granted on condition that the defendant’s pay the plaintiff’s costs for the term. The question being raised what was meant by plaintiffs costs for the term, the Court said, it included only the travel and attendance' of the party, the clerk’s fees, and the witnesses’ fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 R.I. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurston-greene-co-v-roger-williams-mining-co-ri-1850.