Thurston Bryant v. the State of Texas
This text of Thurston Bryant v. the State of Texas (Thurston Bryant v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 16, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00293-CR NO. 14-23-00294-CR
THURSTON BRYANT, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 94555-CR & 95484-CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant was indicted for murder and for altering, destroying, or concealing a human corpse with intent to impair its verity, legibility, or availability as evidence. See TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 19.02(c), 37.09(c). On the fourth day of the consolidated jury trial of the offenses, appellant changed his plea to guilty and pleaded “true” to prior felony convictions for deadly conduct, aggravated robbery, and assault of a public servant. The jury found appellant guilty of both offenses and assessed as punishment confinement for life. The trial court sentenced appellant in accordance with the verdict, and with the sentences to run concurrently. We have consolidated the appeals from both offenses.
Appellant’s sole issue on appeal is that his sentences are grossly disproportionate to the crimes and therefore violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution.
A complaint that a punishment is grossly disproportionate is waived on appeal if that complaint is not raised in the trial court. See Lozano v. State, 577 S.W.3d 275, 277 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, no pet.) (holding that disproportionate- punishment challenges cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Quick v. State, 557 S.W.3d 775, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, pet. ref’d) (holding that disproportionate-punishment challenges under Texas Constitution cannot be raised for the first time on appeal). Because appellant did not raise these complaints in the trial court, he failed to preserve them for appellate review. See Lozano, 577 S.W.3d at 277; Quick, 557 S.W.3d at 788.
We overrule appellant’s sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgments.
/s/ Tracy Christopher Chief Justice
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thurston Bryant v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurston-bryant-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.